ORDER OF THE VICE-PRESIDENT OF THE COURT

27 March 2024 (*)

(Appeal – Interim relief – Approximation of laws – Regulation (EU) 2022/2065 – Single market for digital services – Additional online advertising transparency – Decision to designate a very large online platform – Action for annulment)

In Case C‑639/23 P(R),

APPEAL under the second paragraph of Article 57 of the Statute of the Court of Justice of the European Union, brought on 24 October 2023,

European Commission, represented by L. Armati, A. de Gregorio Merino and P.‑J. Loewenthal, acting as Agents,

appellant,

supported by:

European Parliament, represented by M. Menegatti, E. Ni Chaoimh and L. Taïeb, acting as Agents,

Council of the European Union, represented by N. Brzezinski, M. Moore and E. Sitbon, acting as Agents,

interveners in the appeal,

the other party to the proceedings being:

Amazon Services Europe Sàrl, established in Luxembourg (Luxembourg), represented by A. Conrad and M. Frank, Rechtsanwälte, I. Ioannidis, dikigoros, and R. Spanó, avocat,

applicant at first instance,

THE VICE-PRESIDENT OF THE COURT,

after hearing the Advocate General, M. Szpunar,

makes the following

Order

1 By its appeal, the European Commission seeks to have set aside the order of the President of the General Court of the European Union of 27 September 2023, Amazon Services Europe v Commission (T‑367/23 R, ‘the order under appeal’, EU:T:2023:589), by which the President, first, ordered suspension of the operation of Commission Decision C(2023) 2746 final of 25 April 2023 designating Amazon Store as a very large online platform (‘the decision at issue’) in accordance with Article 33(4) of Regulation (EU) 2022/2065 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 19 October 2022 on a Single Market For Digital Services and amending Directive 2000/31/EC (Digital Services Act) (OJ 2022 L 277, p. 1), in so far as, pursuant to that decision, Amazon Services Europe Sàrl (‘Amazon’) must make the repository required by Article 39 of that regulation publicly available, without prejudice to the obligation for Amazon to compile that repository, and, second, dismissed Amazon’s application for interim measures as to the remainder.